Conference Committee Working on Border Security Funding Schedules First Meeting
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Formal House and Senate negotiations are set to begin tomorrow over the President's demand that Congress appropriate more than $8 BILLION in additional Fiscal Year 2019 funding for border security, a demand that famously includes a request for a $5.7 BILLION appropriation for construction of a wall along the border between the United States and Mexico. |
Tomorrow's action is set to occur in a conference committee that was established late last week to iron out differences between the President and Democrats in Congress over the President's border security funding demands. The conferees will be working under a deadline of February 15, 2019, when the short-term continuing appropriations resolution that re-opened the closed functions of the federal government expires.
As a technical matter, the conference committee that has been established is on the differing House-passed and Senate-passed versions of H.J. Res. 31, a bill making further continuing appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2019, and for other purposes In reality, they are conferencing between two bills that were approved by the respective House and Senate Committees on Appropriations last year: S 3109, in the case of the Senate; [1] and H.R. 6776, in the case of the House. [2]
House Conferees. Appointed as House conferees on H.J. Res. 31 are Representatives Nita Lowey (D-NY), Lucile Roybal-Allard (D-CA), David Price (D-NC), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Henry Cuellar (D-TX), Pete Aguilar (D-CA), Kay Granger (R-TX), Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN), Thomas Graves (R-GA), and Steven Palazzo (R-MS).
Senate Conferees. Appointed as Senate conferees on H.J. Res. 31 are Senators Richard Shelby (R-AL); Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV); John Hoeven (R-ND); Roy Blunt (R-MO); Patrick Leahy (D-VT); Richard Durbin (D-IL); and Jon Tester (D-MT).
Matters to be Settled. The matters that conferees will need to resolve can be divided into three categories: funding matters requested by the President, policy matters he requested, and unknown matters that could be injected into the conference.
Most of the differences between the House- and Senate-passed versions of the Fiscal Year 2019 Homeland Security Appropriations Act were worked out last year by the members of the two committees. Many of those agreements are reflected in a Draft Committee Report released last week by Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL).
House Conferees. Appointed as House conferees on H.J. Res. 31 are Representatives Nita Lowey (D-NY), Lucile Roybal-Allard (D-CA), David Price (D-NC), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Henry Cuellar (D-TX), Pete Aguilar (D-CA), Kay Granger (R-TX), Chuck Fleischmann (R-TN), Thomas Graves (R-GA), and Steven Palazzo (R-MS).
Senate Conferees. Appointed as Senate conferees on H.J. Res. 31 are Senators Richard Shelby (R-AL); Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV); John Hoeven (R-ND); Roy Blunt (R-MO); Patrick Leahy (D-VT); Richard Durbin (D-IL); and Jon Tester (D-MT).
Matters to be Settled. The matters that conferees will need to resolve can be divided into three categories: funding matters requested by the President, policy matters he requested, and unknown matters that could be injected into the conference.
Most of the differences between the House- and Senate-passed versions of the Fiscal Year 2019 Homeland Security Appropriations Act were worked out last year by the members of the two committees. Many of those agreements are reflected in a Draft Committee Report released last week by Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL).
- Funding Matters Requested by the President. The President has requested the following items that were not contained in the agreement reached last year by House and Senate appropriators:
|
- Policy Matters Requested by the President. The President has requested the following changes in law to implement new immigration policies:
|
Outlook. Democrats have expressed strong opposition to most of the President’s requested add-ons. It is uncertain how the matters in disagreement will be resolved.